USPTO serial 76141992
FUNDWATCHDOG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUNDWATCHDOG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glenn A. Gundersen
GLENN A GUNDERSEN CIRA CTRDECHERT LLP2929 ARCH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19104-2808Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | information services, namely, providing mutual fund directors with industry news and regulatory and compliance information for mutual fund directors by means of a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, providing mutual fund directors with secure communications services by means of a global computer network, namely, online conferencing and e-mail messaging services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely, providing mutual fund directors with on-line education and training in the field of mutual funds through lectures, classes and seminars via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |