USPTO serial 76142450
COMPASS PORTFOLIO PROGRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMPASS PORTFOLIO PROGRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dalbert U. Shefte
KARL S SAWYER JR KENNEDY COVINGTON LOBDELL & HICKMAN, LLPHEARST TWR 47TH FL214 N TRYON STCHARLOTTE, NC 28202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Investment advice, namely, annuities counseling, mutual fund counseling and investment counseling | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 2, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |