USPTO serial 76142459
GAREEB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GAREEB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Newport Beach, CA
Newport Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karin E. Peterka, Esq.
KARIN E PETERKA ESQ BUCHALTER NEMER FIELDS & YOUNGER601 S FIGUEROA ST STE 2400LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-5709UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR SEARCHING, COMPILING, INDEXING, ORGANIZING, RETRIEVING, AND TRANSFERRING INFORMATION ACROSS THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY PLACING ADVERTISEMENTS AND PROMOTIONAL DISPLAYS IN AN ELECTRONIC SITE ACCESSED THROUGH THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | PROVIDING MULTIPLE USERS ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER COLLECTIONS OF INFORMATION NETWORK AND PROVIDING ELECTRONIC MAIL | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATING INDEXES OF INFORMATION ON WEB SITES AVAILABLE ON THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND THROUGH OTHER COMPUTER RESOURCE NETWORKS; SEARCH ENGINE SERVICES, NAMELY, SEARCHING, COMPILING, INDEXING, ORGANIZING, RETRIEVING, AND TRANSFERRING INFORMATION OVER THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND OTHER COMPUTER RESOURCE NETWORKS; AND PROVIDING INFORMATION CONCERNING THE USE OF TEXT, ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS, DATABASES, GRAPHICS, AND AUDIOVISUAL INFORMATION SERVICES; OVER THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gareeb Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Gareeb Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GAREEB
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |