USPTO serial 76142643
PHONESTONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHONESTONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Killworth
RICHARD A KILLWORTH DINSMORE & SHOHL LLPONE S MAIN ST STE 1300ONE DAYTON CTRDAYTON, OH 45402-2023Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | PRECIOUS AND SEMI-PRECIOUS GEMSTONES; JEWELRY, NAMELY, PENDANTS, BRACELETS, BROOCHES, NECKLACES, CHARMS, RINGS AND CUFFLINKS, ALL INCLUDING PRECIOUS AND SEMI-PRECIOUS GEMSTONES AND CRYSTALS; AND MOUNTS, HOLDERS AND CASES ADAPTED TO SUPPORT OR DISPLAY ANY OF THE AFORESAID GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | DECORATIVE CRYSTALS AND MOUNTS, HOLDERS AND CASES ADAPTED TO SUPPORT OR DISPLAY CRYSTALS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Smith, Wendy
- Other trademarks owned by Smith, Wendy
- Other trademarks owned by Holt, Jason
- Other trademarks owned by Holt, Jason
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named PHONESTONE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |