Drawing for Serial No. 76142680

USPTO serial 76142680

Serial No. 76142680

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76142680?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary A Francis

MARY A FRANCIS THELEN REID PRIEST LLP101 2ND ST STE 1800SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-3659UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003SPA PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BATH GELS, BATH SOAPS, BATH SALTS, BATH OILS, MASSAGE OIL, MASSAGE LOTION, FACIAL MUDS, BODY MUDS, FACIAL SCRUBBING CREAMS, BODY SCRUBBING CREAMS, AROMATHERAPY OILS, STONE MASSAGE KITS COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF MASSAGE STONES AND STONE HEATER, AYURVEDIC BODY OILS, AYURVEDIC SCALP OILS, AYURVEDIC MASSAGE OILS, AYURVEDIC FACIAL OILS, SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY TALCUM POWDER, SKIN CLEANSERS, SKIN LOTION, SKIN SOAP, SKIN MOISTURIZING MASKS, SKIN MOISTURIZER, SKIN TONERS, SKIN CLEANSING MASKS, SKIN EXFOLIATORS, SKIN PEELING CREAMS, BODY LOTIONS, SHAMPOO, CONDITIONER, SHAVING BALM, SHAVING FOAM, SHAVING GEL, FOOT CREAMS, HAND CREAMS, CUTICLE CREAMS, EYE CREAMS, SUNTAN LOTION, AFTER-SUN LOTION AND SELF-TANNING LOTION, COSMETICS, NAMELY LIPSTICK, LIP PENCIL, LIP GLOSS, FOUNDATION, CONCEALER, FACE POWDER, EYE SHADOW, EYE LINER, FALSE EYELASHES, BROW PENCIL, BLUSH, COSMETIC PENCILS, COSMETIC PADS, COSMETIC BALLS, FALSE NAILS AND NAIL POLISHACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 30, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 18, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 25, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 3, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance