USPTO serial 76142693
ACCELECOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACCELECOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London SE1 9SY, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beth M Goldman
BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP333 BUSH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2878UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Electronic data warehousing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software maintenance and support services; providing access time to computer databases in the field of business; legal services; consultation, advise, assistance, analysis, design, evaluation and programming services relating to computer software, firmware, hardware and to information technology; computer consultation and advise relating to the evaluation, choosing and implementation of computer software, firmware, hardware, information technology and of data-processing system; provision of information in the field of technical matters, information technology, legal matters and intellectual property; legal services, namely management of intellectual property; computer consultation and computer systems analysis; leasing of computer, custom design of computer software for back office operations of business planning and management; web hosting services; hosting computer programs and database for back office operations and functions on a server for use by others over the Internet; web portal development; computer programming for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |