Drawing for EXPRESSIONS INTERNATIONAL

USPTO serial 76142695

EXPRESSIONS INTERNATIONAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXPRESSIONS INTERNATIONAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Micheal Cleary, Esq.

J MICHAEL CLEARY ESQ CLEARY & KOMEN, LLP600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE SESTE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20003-4316

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035wholesale distributorships featuring furniture, home accents and decorative accessories, and giftwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 4, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 4, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 18, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 30, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 29, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 29, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 21, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 15, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 8, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 27, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance