USPTO serial 76142699
WIDE OPEN WEST BRINGING BROADBAND HOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WIDE OPEN WEST BRINGING BROADBAND HOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore W Olds III
THEODORE W OLDS III CARLSON GASKEY OLDS PC400 W MAPLE RD STE 350BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009-3324UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | ELECTRONIC DATA TRANSMISSION SERVICES VIA CABLE TELEVISION, TELEPHONE, INTERACTIVE TELEVISION, INTERACTIVE SWITCHED DIGITAL AND ANALOG SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; TELEPHONIC ACCESS THROUGH A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; AND ETHERNET DATA TRANSMISSION OVER THE TYPE OF TRANSMISSION LINE TYPICALLY KNOWN AS "BROAD BAND" AND PROVIDED BY A FRANCHISEE AS PART OF A FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH A COMMUNITY TO INDIVIDUALS IN THAT COMMUNITY | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 22, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |