Drawing for SIMPLIFY NOW

USPTO serial 76142760

SIMPLIFY NOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMPLIFY NOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erik B. Cherdak

ERIK B CHERDAK ERIK B CHERDAK & ASSOCIATES11300 ROCKVILLE PIKE STE 906ROCKVILLE, MD 20852-3034UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telephone switching systems comprised of computer software and hardware technology used to route calls and to provide telephony services to callsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 23, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 19, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 25, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 29, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance