USPTO serial 76142809
STOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HENRY W. CUMMINGS
HENRY W CUMMINGS3313 W ADAMS STSAINT CHARLES, MO 63301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Absorbent articles, namely, incontinence pads | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2005 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |