Drawing for Serial No. 76143014

USPTO serial 76143014

Serial No. 76143014

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76143014?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clark A Puntigam

CLARK A PUNTIGAM JENSEN PUNTIGAM2033 6TH AVE STE 1020SEATTLE, WA 98121-2527UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021toothbrushesACTIVEDec 7, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 28, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 5, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 5, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 5, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 1, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 1, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 19, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 5, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance