USPTO serial 76143133
HIGHWAY 12
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HIGHWAY 12?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J Liss
MARK J LISS LEYDIG VOIT MAYER LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601-6780UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial and investment services, namely, investment and management services related too the operation of venture capital funds; managing venture capital funds for others; venture capital services, namely, providing venture capital for establishment, operation and expansion of emerging technology companies; and venture capital financing services | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |