Drawing for GENIDOCS

USPTO serial 76143235

GENIDOCS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
PRE-PUBLICATION FINAL REVIEW

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GENIDOCS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heather E Balmat

HEATHER E BALMAT TESTA HURWITZ THIBEAULTHIGH ST TWR125 HIGH ST STE 2200BOSTON, MA 02110-2725

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software used for secure and confirmed electronic data delivery over networks, including the InternetABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2004ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 23, 2004EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 8, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 25, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance