USPTO serial 76143733
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
Minneapolis, MN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SANDRA EPP RYAN
SANDRA EPP RYAN MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Magazines and buyer guides concerning the business of computer-based or internet-based training and education, or training and education that involves the use of information technology, for use by technology developers and corporate training/education services managers, not for use in teaching | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2000 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing magazines over a website concerning the business of computer-based or internet-based training and education, or training and education that involves the use of information technology, for use by technology developers and corporate training/education services managers, not for use in teaching | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |