Drawing for GOLF YARDS

USPTO serial 76144054

GOLF YARDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLF YARDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph T. Nabor

JOSEPH T NABOR FITCH EVEN TABIN & FLANNERY120 S LA SALLE ST STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60603-3403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Travel bagsACTIVE—
028golf bags, golf tees, golf balls, golf ball markers, golf clubs, golf club heads, golf club shafts, hand grips for golf clubs, and golf glovesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 12, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 5, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 12, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 12, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 15, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 1, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 1, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 28, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 28, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 18, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 30, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 19, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 14, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 24, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 13, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance