USPTO serial 76144177
LANGUAGE OF FLOWERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LANGUAGE OF FLOWERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven C Schnedler
STEVEN C SCHNEDLER CARTER & SCHNEDLER PA56 CENTRAL AVE #101P O BOX 2985ASHEVILLE, NC 28802-2985Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | CANDY; CANDY COATED POPCORN; CANDY MINTS; CARAMELS; CHOCOLATE-FILLINGS FOR CAKES AND PIES; CHOCOLATE; CHOCOLATE CHIPS; CHOCOLATE COVERED NUTS; CHOCOLATE FONDUE; CHOCOLATE FOOD BEVERAGES NOT BEING DAIRY-BASED OR VEGETABLE BASED; CHOCOLATE TRUFFLES; COCOA; CONFECTIONERY CHIPS FOR BAKING; CUSTARD-BASED FILLINGS FOR CAKES AND PIES; EXTRACTS USED AS FLAVORING; FLAVORED ICES; FLAVORING ADDITIVES FOR NON-NUTRITIONAL PURPOSES; FLAVORING SYRUP; FOOD FLAVORINGS; FROZEN YOGURT; FRUIT ICE; GRAIN-BASED FOOD BEVERAGES; HONEY; ICE CREAM; ICE CREAM SUBSTITUTE; ICE MILK; MARSHMALLOWS; MARSHMALLOW TOPPING; NON-MEDICATED LOZENGES; PARFAITS; SAUCES; SHERBET; SORBET; SOY-BASED ICE CREAM SUBSTITUTE; SUGAR; TEA-BASED BEVERAGES WITH FRUIT FLAVORING; TEA; AND TOPPING SYRUP | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |