USPTO serial 76144234
BIRCH WOOD PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIRCH WOOD PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JENNIFER MITCHELL
JENNIFER MITCHELL GARDINER ROBERTS BARRISTER & SOLICITORSSCOTIA PLZ STE 310040 KING ST WTORONTO, ON M5H 3Y2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | wood-based home office or office furniture, namely bookcases, chairs, desks, computer desks and tables, drafting tables and stools, cabinets, wall units, filing cabinets, wall shelves and credenzas all in International Class 20; wood-based office accessories, namely picture frames, clocks, lamps, carvings, plant stands and holders, pedestals, sculptures, pencil holders, card holders, and desk organizers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |