USPTO serial 76144277
SYSTEM IN A PACKAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2701530Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 25, 2003
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SYSTEM IN A PACKAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
T. Daniel Christenbury
T. Daniel Christenbury DLA Piper LLP (US)One Liberty Place1650 Market Street, Suite 4900Philadelphia, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MIMICS, NAMELY, POWER AMPLIFIERS, MICROWAVE DIODES, MICROWAVE MIXERS, AND MICROWAVE ATTENUATORS; MICROWAVE DISCREET COMPONENTS, NAMELY, MICROWAVE MIXERS, MICROWAVE FILTERS, MICROWAVE DUPLEXERS, MICROWAVE COUPLERS, MICROWAVE POWER DIVIDERS, MICROWAVE PHASE SHIFTERS, MICROWAVE VECTOR MODULATORS AND MICROWAVE SEMICONDUCTORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 8, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2009 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |