Drawing for ADVANTASOY

USPTO serial 76144372

ADVANTASOY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADVANTASOY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald E. Hunter, Thomas W. Lindberg, Scott T. Piering

RONALD E HUNTER, THOMAS W LINDBERG SC CARGILL, INCORPORATEDLAW DEPT MS 24PO BOX 5624MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001SOY EXTRACTS AND ISOFLAVONES FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF FOOD PRODUCTS AND BEVERAGESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 18, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 8, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 6, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 20, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 20, 2004OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jan 17, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 24, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 30, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance