USPTO serial 76144373
ADVANTASOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADVANTASOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald E. Hunter, Thomas W. Lindberg, Scott T. Piering
RONALD E HUNTER, THOMAS W LINDBERG SC CARGILL, INCORPORATEDLAW DEPT MS 24PO BOX 5624MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SOY EXTRACTS AND ISOFLAVONES FOR USE AS INGREDIENTS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF DIETARY AND NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |