Drawing for SAFENEZ

USPTO serial 76144557

SAFENEZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAFENEZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David S Kashman

DAVID S KASHMAN GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, FOR MERCHANTS AND RETAILERS, VIA INTERACTIVE GLOBAL COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATION NETWORKS; BUSINESS MARKETING SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A WEB SITE WHICH FEATURES ADVERTISEMENTS FOR THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, AND PROVIDING A WEB SITE WHICH FEATURES INTEGRATED TRACKING AND MANAGEMENT OF COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC BUSINESS DATA INTERCHANGE; PROVIDING BUSINESS INFORMATION, NAMELY, PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS VIA THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; AND PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY AWARDING PURCHASE POINTS FOR CREDIT CARD USEACTIVE—
036FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC BANKING, ELECTRONIC CREDIT CARD SERVICES, ELECTRONIC DEBIT CARD SERVICES, ELECTRONIC CHARGE CARD SERVICES; ISSUING PREPAID STORED VALUE CARDS; ELECTRONIC CREDIT CARD TRANSACTION PROCESSING SERVICES; ELECTRONIC DEBIT CARD TRANSACTION PROCESSING SERVICES; ELECTRONIC DEBIT CARD TRANSACTION PROCESSING SERVICES; ELECTRONIC FUNDS AND CURRENCY TRANSFER; ELECTRONIC PAYMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF BILL PAYMENT DATA; ELECTRONIC CASH TRANSACTIONS, PROVIDING AUTHORIZATION OF ELECTRONIC FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS OVER GLOBAL INTERACTIVE COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; ELECTRONIC TRAVEL INSURANCE AND PRODUCT INSURANCE UNDERWRITING SERVICES; AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND CONSULTATION RELATED TO ALL OF THE AFORESAIDACTIVE—
038COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS, AND ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF IMAGES AND/OR PHOTOGRAPHS VIA THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 27, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance