USPTO serial 76144748
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Portmarnock, Co. Dublin, IE
Portmarnock, Co. Dublin, IE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M Kim
JOHN M KIM GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLPSTE 11004365 EXECUTIVE DRSAN DIEGO, CA 92121-2133| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for manipulating spatial, graphical and other attribute data, namely computer software for creating, maintaining, validating and analyzing boundary and polygon and network topologies from node, point or geographic co-ordinate data within a database and related toolkit applications, namely, pre-recorded spatial database computer software program contained on CD ROMS or electronic format for graphically interfacing with applications from a database; spatial and graphical data viewer application software for multi-user viewing, editing and analyzing imagery, vector and attribute data within a database; application program interfaces | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | printed matter, namely, manuals, books and pamphlets all relating to computer software products for manipulating spatial, graphical and other attribute data | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | electronic transmission and reception of data and information; electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; providing multi-user access to a global computer information network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer network management services for others in relation to spatial, vector, graphical and attribute data; on-line information services in the field of spatial and attribute data | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |