USPTO serial 76144969
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Angeles, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business development services, namely, business consulting, analysis and advisory services provided to emerging and developing companies, media/entertainment companies, technology companies, and Internet and digital enterprises; analyzing market position and recommending key strategy partnerships and key customers to emerging and developing companies, media/entertainment companies, technology companies, and Internet and digital enterprises; strategic business planning and business consulting services provided to emerging and developing companies, media/entertainment companies, technology companies, and Internet and digital enterprises; business development and consultation services regarding use of broadband media, wireless, Internet communications, radio, television, motion picture, publishing and other new media; computer database management in the nature of compiling and aggregating content and technologies of others and creating new content for use by others on behalf of emerging and developing companies, media/entertainment companies, technology companies, and Internet and digital enterprises including broad band, Internet, cellular, interactive cable and satellite companies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2003 |
| 036 | Capital investment consultation; financial investment in the fields of technology, content and intellectual property in emerging and developing companies, broadband and digital media companies and Internet based companies; investment management; investment, financial and capital management and consultation services for emerging and developing companies, broadband and digital media companies, and Internet based companies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 28, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 28, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |