USPTO serial 76144997
SWISS POST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3081078Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 18, 2006
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SWISS POST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN LAW ASSOCIATES PC80 S HIGHLAND AVEOSSINING, NY 10562UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | watches, clocks and alarm clocks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | AMPB | AMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |