Drawing for VEGGIE CRISPS

USPTO serial 76145027

VEGGIE CRISPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARTY, GEORGIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VEGGIE CRISPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric D. Paulsrud

ERIC D PAULSRUDLEONARD, ST AND DEINARD150 S FIFTH ST STE 2300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Potato chips, and snack foods made primarily from potato flour with other vegetable ingredientsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 28, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 22, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 17, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 18, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 29, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 25, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 30, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 15, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 20, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 14, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance