USPTO serial 76145418
IMATIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMATIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TRISHA DORE
TRISHA DORE ACCUPRO TRADEMARK SERVICES LTD401 W GEORGE ST STE 702VANCOUVER, BC V6B 5A1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING GLOBAL POSITIONING INFORMATION TO MOBILE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS DEVICES, SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER SERVERS FOR PROCESSING LOCATION INFORMATION SENT FROM SUCH DEVICES, SOFTWARE FOR TRACKING, MAPPING AND DISPLAYING DEVICE LOCATIONS, AND SOFTWARE FOR AUTOMATICALLY TAILORING INFORMATION SENT VIA THE INTERNET OR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS TO CONNECTED DEVICES BASED ON THEIR CURRENT LOCATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |