USPTO serial 76145529
CAT COSMETICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2828837Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 6, 2004
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CAT COSMETICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lora A. Moffatt
BRIAN C DAUPHIN DAUPHIN LAW OFFICES9 BARTLETT ST STE 365ANDOVER, MA 01810UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, compacts, facial cleansers, skin cleansers, eye creams, foundation makeup and lipstick; make-up kit comprised of bronzer, lip liner, lip gloss, blush, eye shadow, eye liner; skin moisturizers; hair shampoos; hand soaps; skin toners | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 29, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |