Drawing for INTEL DOT.STATION

USPTO serial 76145767

INTEL DOT.STATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FISHER, LATONIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTEL DOT.STATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katherine M. Basile

Katherine M. Basile Reed Smith LLPP.O. Box 488Reed Smith Docketing DepartmentPittsburgh, PA 15230

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTERS AND THEIR PARTS AND PERIPHERALS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY SOFTWARE FOR ELECTRONIC MAIL AND ACCESSING AND NAVIGATING THE INTERNET; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS TO ACCESS AND NAVIGATE THE INTERNET; TELECOMMUNICATION DEVICES, NAMELY THOSE WITH INTEGRATED MONITORS OR DISPLAYS, NAMELY COMPUTERS, CELL PHONES AND PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS; MONITORS, NAMELY COMPUTER MONITORS, CELL PHONE MONITORS AND PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT MONITORS; MODEMS; AND SET-TOP BOXESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 15, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 11, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 15, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 200144DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Apr 4, 2001PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Oct 13, 2000PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance