Drawing for TWO AGAINST ONE COUPLES BATTLING PROSTATE CANCER

USPTO serial 76146101

TWO AGAINST ONE COUPLES BATTLING PROSTATE CANCER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TWO AGAINST ONE COUPLES BATTLING PROSTATE CANCER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ann Lamport Hammitte

WILLIAM A SCOFIELD JR LAHIVE & COCKFIELD LLP28 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035MEDICAL REFERRAL SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF TREATMENT FOR PROSTATE CANCER AND PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY REFERRING PATIENTS TO HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS IN THE FIELD OF TREATMENT FOR PROSTATE CANCER VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—
041Development and dissemination of educational materials of others in the fields of treatment for prostate cancer and pharmaceutical productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 12, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2005REINREINSTATED—
Jan 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 1, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 1, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2004MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 8, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 1, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 23, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 22, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 21, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 29, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 29, 2003AAUDAMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED—
Dec 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 7, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 6, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 24, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2001CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED—
Jul 30, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 17, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance