Drawing for CHOCOCAT

USPTO serial 76146113

CHOCOCAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHOCOCAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda Joy Kattwinkel

LINDA JOY KATTWINKEL OWEN WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON PC455 MARKET ST FL 19SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2420UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026HAIR BANDS, HAIR BOWS, HAIR RIBBONS, HAIR ORNAMENTS, HAIR CLIPS, FABRIC COVERED ELASTIC BANDS FOR HAIR, PONYTAIL HOLDERS, BARRETTES, CLOTHING BUCKLES NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; SHOE LACES; SAFETY PIN SETS; SEWING KITS COMPRISED OF SHIRT BUTTONS, SNAP FASTENERS, SAFETY PINS, NEEDLES, SCISSORS AND THREAD; BOWS FOR GIFT WRAPPING, AND RIBBONS FOR GIFT WRAPPINGACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 8, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 8, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 5, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 19, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 22, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 11, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 23, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance