Drawing for VIA! NET

USPTO serial 76146152

VIA! NET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2896026Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 19, 2004
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with VIA! NET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Valerie Brennan

VALERIE BRENNAN HOGAN & HARTSON LLPBOX INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY8300 GREENSBORO DR STE 1100MCLEAN, VA 22102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009DATA TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS COMPOSED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR HOME DATA TRANSMISSION NETWORKS; INTERACTIVE TOUCHSCREEN ELECTRICAL CONTROLLERS FOR HOME ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT AND VIDEO DISPLAY SCREENS FOR HOME AUDIO AND VIDEO DEVICE CONTROL AND MONITORINGSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 28, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 15, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 8, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 16, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 20, 2011C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Mar 16, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 29, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 8, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 1, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 24, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 24, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 24, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 27, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 20, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 25, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 28, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 21, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 14, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 14, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 10, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 10, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 13, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2004REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 9, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 23, 2004REINREINSTATED—
Jun 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 21, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 3, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 3, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 22, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 2, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 9, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance