USPTO serial 76146250
BUILDING THE WORLD'S LARGEST COMPUTER, ONE COMPUTER AT A TIME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUILDING THE WORLD'S LARGEST COMPUTER, ONE COMPUTER AT A TIME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shannon T. Vale
SHANNON T VALE SAN JOSE CALIFORNIA 95110FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP600 CONGRESS AVE STE 2400AUSTIN, TX 78701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, INTEGRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPUTERIZED SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS, DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INTEGRATION; OPERATION, AND MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTER SISTERS AND NETWORKS; INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER NETWORKS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING, MASSIVELY PARALLEL PROCESSING, PEER TO PEER COMPUTING, COMPUTER NETWORKING, COMPUTER SYSTEM INTEGRATION AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |