Drawing for TAKING A RISK IS BETTER THAN NO RISK AT ALL

USPTO serial 76146343

TAKING A RISK IS BETTER THAN NO RISK AT ALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAKING A RISK IS BETTER THAN NO RISK AT ALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas P. Arden

THOMAS P ARDEN HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLC131 S DEARBORN 30TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportation; transport by boat, air, railway, and barge; conducting sightseeing tours for others; arranging travel toursACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 9, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2004PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Jun 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 11, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 11, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 11, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 12, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 10, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 31, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 11, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 19, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 6, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance