USPTO serial 76146356
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Redwood City, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew P Bridges
ROSE HAGAN GOOGLE INCBLDG 411600 AMPHITHEATRE PKWYMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94043| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR COLLECTING AND ANALYZING CUSTOMER AND CUSTOMER SERVICE RELATED DATA; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR COLLECTING AND ANALYZING DEMOGRAPHICS, CUSTOMER CHARACTERISTICS, AND CUSTOMER PREFERENCES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR DATA EXTRACTION, DATA MINING, DATA STORAGE, DATABASE MARKETING, AND DISTRIBUTION OF INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS VIA THE DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING MATERIAL VIA ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS CONSUMER PROFILES; MARKET ANALYSIS; MARKET ANALYSIS OF USERS OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING A SEARCH ENGINE FOR OBTAINING DATA ON ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; PROVIDING A WIDE RANGE OF INFORMATION VIA ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; SOFTWARE DESIGN AND CONSULTING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |