USPTO serial 76146444
ALLIGATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALLIGATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cambridge CB4 0HH, GB
Cambridge CB4 0HH, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas E. Smith
THOMAS E SMITH BARNES & THORNBURGPO BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE ENABLING WIRELESS CONNECTION TO DATABASES AND/OR TO THE INTERNET FROM MOBILE TELEPHONES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE ENABLING THE TRANSMISSION, STORAGE, DISPLAY AND/OR SEARCHING OF ELECTRONIC DATA AND/OR SOUND AND/OR IMAGES BY MOBILE TELEPHONES; DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER PROGRAMS SUPPLIED ON-LINE OR BY WIRELESS CONNECTION FROM DATABASES OR THE INTERNET FOR ENABLING WIRELESS CONNECTION TO DATABASES AND/OR TO THE INTERNET FROM MOBILE TELEPHONES AND FOR ENABLING THE TRANSMISSION, STORAGE, DISPLAY AND/OR SEARCHING OF ELECTRONIC DATA AND/OR SOUND AND/OR IMAGES BY MOBILE TELEPHONES; OPTICAL, MAGNETIC, AND SOLID-STATE DATA CARRIERS PRE-RECORDED WITH COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ENABLING WIRELESS CONNECTION TO DATABASES AND/OR TO THE INTERNET FROM MOBILE TELEPHONES AND FOR ENABLING THE TRANSMISSION, STORAGE, DISPLAY AND/OR SEARCHING OF ELECTRONIC DATA AND/OR SOUND AND/OR IMAGES BY MOBILE TELEPHONES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL CONSULTANCY SERVICES RELATING TO THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS; PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL CONSULTANCY SERVICES RELATING TO MOBILE TELEPHONY; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF MOBILE TELEPHONE APPARATUS, MOBILE TELEPHONE APPARATUS, MOBILE TELEPHONE SYSTEMS, AND/OR OF APPLICATIONS THEREFORE; DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND UP-DATING OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR MOBILE TELEPHONE APPARATUS AND/OR MOBILE TELEPHONE SYSTEMS; DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, AND/OR COMPUTER PROGRAMS, AND/OR MOBILE TELEPHONE APPARATUS, AND/OR MOBILE TELEPHONE SYSTEMS; PREPARATION OF REPORTS AND PROVISION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO ANY OF THE FOREGOING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |