USPTO serial 76146545
FOCUS ONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOCUS ONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J Pawlak Jr
DANIELE E BOURGEOIS ERICATROUTMAN SANDERS LLP600 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 5200, BANK OF AMATLANTA, GA 30308-2216Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in network design and management | ABANDONED | Aug 16, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |