Drawing for JOAN

USPTO serial 76146675

JOAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JOAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amanda C Samuel

AMANDA C SAMUEL WEIL GOTSHAL AND MANGES767 5TH AVE FL CONC1NEW YORK, NY 10153-0119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018luggage, handbags and leather accessories, namely, wallets, briefcase-type portfolios, attache cases, purses, business card cases, credit card cases and key casesACTIVE—
025shoes, and clothing, namely, ties, scarves, coats, hats, suits, dresses, sweaters, skirts, shirts, blouses, stockings, gloves, money belts, underwear, robes, rain coats, slacks, jackets, lingerie and bathing suitsACTIVE—
042wholesale distributorships and retail store services featuring clothing, footwear, leather goods and accessoriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 28, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 28, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 5, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 30, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 13, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance