USPTO serial 76146827
Serial No. 76146827
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 76146827?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce B. Brunda
BRUCE B BRUNDA STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE, STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | DO-IT-YOURSELF CERAMIC STUDIO, PROVIDING THE USE OF VARIOUS SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, UNPAINTED CERAMIC BOWLS, DISHES AND CONTAINERS IN A VARIETY OF SHAPES AND SIZES, PICTURE FRAMES, NIGHT LIGHTS, SALT AND PEPPER SHAKERS, PAINTS, GLAZES AND FIRING MATERIALS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |