USPTO serial 76147119
MGALINKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MGALINKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary L. Kemp
GARY L KEMP CASNER & EDWARD LLP303 CONGRESS STBOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Golf club services, namely, supervising golfing events; rating, measuring and marking golf courses; coordinating, organizing, managing and supervising professional and amateur golfing events held in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; providing golf instruction; promoting and enforcing the rules of golf; managing the golf handicap system; conducting golf related conferences; providing seminars on the rules of golf; acting as a liaison to the national and regional golf associations; publication of golf event calendars; processing and examining amateur status reinstatement | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |