USPTO serial 76147289
SURPASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SURPASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jack D Nimz
JACK D NIMZ WM WRIGLEY JR COMPANY410 N MICHIGAN AVECHICAGO, IL 60611-4213UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | MEDICATED CHEWING GUMS; NAMELY, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF COLDS, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF COUGH, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF BAD BREATH, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR WEIGHT MANAGEMENT/LOSS, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF INDIGESTION, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF HEARTBURN, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF ALLERGIES, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF NASAL CONGESTION, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF SORE THROAT PAIN, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF BODY ACHES MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF MOUTH GERMS, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION AND MEDICATED CHEWING GUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF NICOTINE ADDICTION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |