USPTO serial 76147372
TERRAPLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3245230Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 22, 2007
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TERRAPLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
171 54 Solna, SE
171 54 Solna, SE
171 54 Solna, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERN PLLC400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2237UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING INFORMATION TO CUSTOMERS REGARDING SALES OF APPLICATIONS AND SYSTEMS FOR USE ON GAME PRODUCTS THROUGHOUT THE NETWORKS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES PROVIDING ONLINE COMPUTER GAMES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, PROFESSIONAL COMPUTER CONSULTATION; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING AND PROFESSIONAL COMPUTER CONSULTATIONS WITHIN THE FIELD OF IMPROVEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF APPLICATIONS AND SYSTEMS WITHIN THE FIELD OF GAMES TO BE USED ON NETWORKS, INCLUDING THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TerraPlay AB
- Other trademarks owned by TerraPlay AB
- Other trademarks owned by TerraPlay AB
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TERRAPLAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |