Drawing for LIVELITE

USPTO serial 76147470

LIVELITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIVELITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn A. Gromlovits

Kathryn A. Gromlovits Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP128 South Tryon StreetSuite 1800Charlotte, NC 28202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal building materials, namely, lattices, roof trusses, girders, joists, trellises, beams, rails, posts, latch bars, tubing, and cornices for temporary structures, exhibition structures, lighting gantries, stage structures, stage platforms, and backdrops; metal pipe fittings and couplings, namely, spigots, collars, elbows, connectors and clips; metal wall panels, ceiling panels and flooring for stage structures; prefabricated metal platformsACTIVE—
009Electricity conduits; plastic conduit for electrical use; electrical conductors; electric connectors; electric light dimmers; electric light switchesACTIVE—
011Electric track lighting units; electrical lighting fixturesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 3, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 24, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 24, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 3, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 3, 2005CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Dec 29, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 29, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 24, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 22, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 25, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 16, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 13, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance