Drawing for SYNERGENCE GROUP

USPTO serial 76147527

SYNERGENCE GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYNERGENCE GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DARRAH DESMOND COUSINO

DARRAH DESMOND COUSINO Synergence Group, Inc.515 N. State Street, Suite 400Chicago, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Conducting business and market research surveys in the field of insurance and related products and employee benefits; business marketing consulting services for professional, fraternal, and trade associations; association services, namely, promoting the interests of member professional, fraternal, and trade associations, namely, associations of attorneys, carpenters, medical professionals, plumbers, retirees, and teachersACTIVE—
036Insurance producer and agent services in the fields of life, accident, health, property, casualty, annuity, fire, home, and auto insurance; insurance third party administrator; administration of employee benefit and pension plans; financial analysis, investment and consultation; multiple employer trust management accounts services, namely, providing products and administrative services to these trusts that are ancillary to insurance services; consultation in the field of employee benefits and benefits administrationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 23, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 19, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 18, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 1, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 3, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 31, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 24, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 31, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 24, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 20, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 15, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 10, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Mar 24, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 1, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 28, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 28, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 28, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 25, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 22, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 19, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance