USPTO serial 76147569
EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR
ROGER P FUREY ESQ KATTEN MUCHIN ZAVIS ROSENMAN1025 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST NW STE 700EEAST LOBBYWASHINGTON, DC 20007-5201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal containers for the storage and transportation of batteries | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Hand operated battery tools, namely, all-purpose wire cutters, battery terminal spreader, bulb battery filler, battery post cleaning-cutting tool, and battery terminal lifter in the nature of a jack | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Containers used to store batteries, not of metal for commercial use | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Hand operated battery tools, namely, wire post/terminal cleaning brush; containers used to store batteries for household or kitchen use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES
- Other trademarks owned by EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES
- Other trademarks owned by EXIDE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 30, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 30, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |