USPTO serial 76147616
CATALYTIC NETWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CATALYTIC NETWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa Georges Esq
MELISSA GEORGES ESQ FRANKFURT GARBUS488 MADISON AVE FL 9NEW YORK, NY 10022-5754UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation services, namely assisting businesses in the selection of appropriate technology, organization and structure of such technology and the necessary resources for implementing such technology; assisting businesses in the selection of technical staff; assisting businesses with technical project management, namely development of project plans, conducting due diligence, selection of technology and software packages, selection of web hosts, security design and business development methodology | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely broadcasting, narrow casting, conferencing, and transmission of digital video over a global computer network and mobile communication devices; coordination and tracking of software development teams and storage and distribution of software development work products | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical consulting services, namely assisting businesses in the selection of computer server hardware for the development and implementation of computer networks and wireless communications networks; technical consulting services, namely assisting businesses in the design and implementation of-- hardware platforms and appliances utilizing wireless technology for mobile communication devices; software for use with mobile communication devices; software for the management of technology projects; software for use in the improvement of software development and methodologies; software for use in the automation of business processes; software to aid in the gathering, storage, categorization and analysis of data; software for use in interactive and web-based media applications; software to facilitate interest in online businesses and markets; and infrastructure and technology for the delivery of content and services via mobile communication devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |