Drawing for COMPETE IN THE NEW ECONOMY

USPTO serial 76147827

COMPETE IN THE NEW ECONOMY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPETE IN THE NEW ECONOMY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas C. McDonough

VIRGINIA R RICHARD WINSTON & STRAWN200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software development tools; computer search engine software; computer software to generate banners on websites for advertising and entertainment purposes, that enables real-time intercommunications, simultaneous data manipulation and instantaneous feedback for analyzing website marketing data to store, that may be downloaded from a global computer network; audio and video multimedia streaming software for use in compressing and processing images and video for use on a global computer networkACTIVE—
035Business marketing consulting services; business consulting services in the field of marketing communications, marketing research, public relation services, providing business techniques relating to e-commerce and the global computer network and computer technology integration and architecture services related thereto; advertising agency services; preparing audio-visual presentations for use in advertisingACTIVEApr 1, 2000
041Videotape, CD-ROM, and DVD production services; online computer education training regarding the use of customized software applicationsACTIVEApr 1, 2000
042Website design and development services; design of multimedia software recorded on CD-ROM for marketing, advertising, training and communication purposes; custom design of computer software in multiple fields for others; computer software design consultationACTIVEApr 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 9, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 21, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 1, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 20011.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Oct 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance