USPTO serial 76147954
FILMICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FILMICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B Murray
ROBERT B MURRAY ARENT FOX KINTER PLOTLKIN & KAHN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MECHANICAL MIXING MACHINES FOR AGITATING LIQUIDS IN A MANUFACTURING PROCESS, AND STRUCTURAL PARTS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |