USPTO serial 76148024
SAN BAUTISTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAN BAUTISTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R Michael West
LAW OFFICES OF R. MICHAEL WESTR MICHAEL W455 CAPITOL MALL STE 405SACRAMENTO, CA 95814Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Tomato Based Food Sauces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LICO Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by LICO Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CORTOPASSI PARTNERS
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SAN BAUTISTA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 21, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |