USPTO serial 76148093
MASKOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MASKOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Vana
JAMES L VANA FOLEY & LARDNERFIRSTAR CTR777 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202-5367Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | FACE MASKS TO BE WORN BY MEDICAL PERSONNEL, PATIENTS, FAMILY MEMBERS AND OTHER VISITORS TO A SURGICAL THEATER; FACE MASKS TO BE WORN BY DENTAL PERSONNEL, FOOD SERVICE AND CLEAN ROOM PERSONNEL, AND OTHER PERSONS IN ENVIRONMENTS WHERE PROTECTION IS REQUIRED AGAINST INHALING AIRBORNE CONTAMINANTS OR OTHER HARMFUL SUBSTANCES OR WHERE MAINTENANCE OF SANITARY CONDITIONS IS REQUIRED | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |