USPTO serial 76148114
FASHIONCHAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FASHIONCHAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORM D. ST. LANDAU
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP NORM D ST LANDAUSTE 11001500 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | A global, multi-language internet site offering business-to-business collaboration services to help increase visibility across the entire supply chain, to help streamline operations between new and existing business partners; to provide access to the worldwide soft goods community to registered users; to provide links to value-added services such as transport, logistics and insurance; to provide timely industry information, news forums and enhanced networking opportunities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |